Considerations

The Theory of Evolution
as "I am a monkey" ! Well apparently I am. Ninety-nine percent of my genes are the same, as well as with lions, cows, pigs and elephants, mice, chimps and all mammals, and plenty in common with fruit flies.

Progressive evolution would have it that from the muck and mire came I, and look at the result. I am the "crown of creation", proving progression and that the universe makes sense, by producing a product as more than what was originally, "matter, anti-matter, protons and anti-protons, neutrons and anti-neutrons, electrons and positrons, neutrinos and anti-neutrinos, and of course photons (which are their own antiparticle) among others".

And of course evolution is scientific, as the laws of genetics, physical material biological dynamics, automatic and autonomous one might say, once the building blocks have been flown in by meteorite. No need for any kind spirituality or religion.

And so the idea was progressive evolutionary improvement. But of course nothing said, about anti-evolution. Crocodiles have existed without evolutionary improvement for 200 million years, or Crocodiles have survived by staying the same.

Which is why progressive evolution makes no sense. All life depends upon and is relative to the consistent and stable relation of the earth's orbit around a point in space, as the specific temperature of the sun. The change of the construction, constitution and function of any given organism, must take the form of correspondence to existing orbital conditions and planetary temperatures and weather.

And another problem with the progressive Theory of Evolution is, that there is no known case or proof, that any species has evolved into any other species, and thus no proof that we all evolved from sea slime to monkeys, to Homo sapiens.

Granted what is called evolution is changes in the physical construct of the biology. For instance people are eating more meat and protean than historically was the case, and consequently are getting taller called basketball evolution. And of course people are getting fatter by a new theory of what is called fast food devolution or anti-evolution and matter.

If ninety-nine percent of the gene pool is the same for all mammals, then it is the one percent that accounts for the differences in species. Which is to say all species are one species with adaptive species specifications. As the Crocodile shows, as long as the environment remains the same, there is no need for evolutionary changes. However when the environment changes especially rapidly, it would be adapt or extinction.

So the theory would be, that from one species another is born, homo sapiens with tails. If a male and female were born and got together, perhaps just like that, no evolution, quick change a new tail is man is born. The genetics of everything in every living thing.

As long as the environment is stable, evolution would be a bad idea. Why should fish want to walk, unless they planed to talk, O in about a million years give or take.

The Theory of Evolution is Progressive Materialism. Materialist because there is not needed nor does there show cause for any non-material hidden hand. It is progressive because a Protozoa can develop into an intelligent human theorectically.

The belief in the progressive superiority of humankind as compared to the rest of nature, by its advanced, elite and superior status, entitles itself to dominate every aspect of the natural world in which it can find the means.

For any real and true progressive development to have validity, an organism must progressively develop out of correspondence with its environment. It then must also change and develop its environment as well. Change of an environment which is composed of millions of separate non-progressive categories of elements, which is changed only to the progressive advantage of one of these elements, is an impossible proposition.

(15 of 96) Next Page