Index
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
The interpreter of reality as the selector of Association is called the
Ego, which interprets actuality and thinking primarily thru the context of the body, as what will affect it, in what-way and when ? The Ego is the first and original personality and the body is of the greatest Consequence.
If Emotion concerns Consequence and Natural Affection not so much, then what is the Emotion of the Conservative system ?
Consequence may be viewed differently. For instance Consequence derived from Authority Reasoning such as Monotheism one-God, would polarize Emotion as love for the one and hate for the other, or love for the imaginary and hate for concrete sensory reality. Consequence is created out of thin-air, with not an inkling of evidence like Russia-gate, always posited as based on authority, though as in the case of God the authority is anonymous whose edicts are in a book, though no-one has ever seen or met the author. Emotion needs no evidence. If one loves a comic book super-hero and that hero dies metaphorically, the emotional grief may be quite palatable. Where evidence is non-existent, Consequence and therefore Emotion would be quite manipulatable.
The evaluative system for the Ego as the psychological Consequence of the Conservative system, is Consequence as Optimum Correspondence or, the best and prime situation and circumstance for any given specific entity. Not too much rain and not too little is best for the farmer. The planet must maintain a temperature between zero and one-hundred degrees fahrenheit approximately for life to continue. Optimum would probably be between fifty and seventy for the
most-part. If these are the facts, Emotion doesn't come into it. It-is what it-is, and getting emotional about it would seem silly to most people.
Intelligence (16 of 19)
Next Page
