Considerations

Progressives are called
Liberals and Pseudo-conservatives, as well as possibly the difference between Catholics and Protestants or Shia and Sunni, the speculative Progressive split along the lines of One and All. Liberals and Pseudo-conservatives are both progressive oriented as Excess and Profit added increase, the difference being the benifit of the profit as the many or the few.

Pseudo-conservatives are called Conservative and do not realize they are Progressive. Liberals are actually more Conservative than Pseudos, and tend Socialist as well, but do not realize it.

Liberals and Pseudo-conservatives both use the same evaluative system called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, which is evaluative determination as a scale of 1 to 10 between antithetical opposites.

The default generic dyadic scale of 1 to 10, represents 1 on the bottom as primitive, uneducated, poor, unrefined, Indigenous, shiftless, un-propertied, unknown. The top as 10 is represented as sophistication, wealth, education, propertied, known to famous, refinement, class, power and aristocratic. Most people look up to 10 and down at 1.

The model as the Pseudo-conservative Liberal dichotomy would use 0 to 10, the zero representing no consequence or no mercy for the absolute bottom utilized by the Pseudo-conservatives. The Liberal scale is 1 to 10, the 1 as the lowest low as of some Consequence and indicating mercy. This model would better explain the Pseudo-conservative Liberal dichotomy.

The antithetical poles are called One and All. One is attributal of Pseudo-conservative, as Progressive pinnacles of singular individual and family authority. The top of the heap as sophistication, education, wealth, power, property and class. Its propensities are male, Patriarchy, autocratic, Monotheism, Capitalism and fascism and the aristocracy.

All is representative of Liberal Progressive attributes, generally more female oriented, family, modesty, Matriarchy, Polytheism, Socialism, Democracy, community, cultural elevation for the all and everyone.

For Pseudo-conservatives, the top as 10 on the scale is attributal One. The bottom is zero as attributal All. Determinative assessment of evaluation is by subtracting from attributal One and adding from attributal All. He is not as rich as a millionaire but not as poor as the lower classes. More elite than common but not as refined as the top. Perhaps 8 on the scale, upper middle class.

For Liberals the top as 10 of the scale is attributal All and the bottom as 1 is attributal One. All represents the commons, the all and everyone, community and social equality, socialism and democracy. One represents the rich, elite, Capitalists, fascism, greed, selfishness, self centered and serving. Determinative assessment of evaluation is by subtracting from attributal All and adding from the attributal One. I may not be rich but I am honest. Well not that honest maybe an eight on the scale. The communists put capitalism on the bottom. The the capitalists put communism on the bottom.

The Pseudo-conservative method of assessment is said to be analogous to the concept of the Part, the function of which is to produce products primarily external to itself. Psychologically the Part as attributal One comes to assume itself and the products it produces as more important and elite than the Whole, and in fact may assume the Identity of the Whole. In this thinking the Whole is to serve the Part rather than the Part the Whole. Aspects of the One predominant as Monotheism, Patriarchy, Capitalism and Fascism. Capitalism because the profits benefit one owner or the few, whereas with socialism, profits benefit the All.

Besides the Pseudo-conservative and Liberal convictions there is considered the true Conservative as represented primarily by Indigenous peoples. True Conservatism is nearly extinct, destroyed by the Progressives and has been so for several hundred years.

The evaluative system of the Conservative is called Optimum Correspondence. Rather than evaluation from two antitheticals, assessment is from a single constant generally inherent in the condition of the assessed entity. Evaluation is assessed as more or less optimum. Roadway speed limits are generally set as optimum to conditions such as straight-aways and curves, and assessment is slower or faster.

Optimum Correspondence is said to be the evaluative system of the Whole. The proper functioning of the Whole would depend on optimum conditions for all the Parts. In the household the lights work, the heater is good, air conditioning when needed, the refrigerator fine, toilet good, well insulated and actually everything operates at optimum function. If the refrigerator works but is noisy, it may not be considered optimum but rather a 7 on the scale, although the noise might for some make it a 3, and for others not matter having once lived under a freeway.

While the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative utilizes two, more or less fixed ends with evaluation in between, and which are relative and subjective, rich/poor, young/old, primitive or refined, Optimum Correspondence assesses from a single fixed constant often inherent in constitution and construct. Optimums of the body are fixed.

In terms of psychology, Optimum Correspondence is the evaluative system of the Ego which is the first and primary personality pre-existing the Identities, the intellectual function of which is to interpret reality in reference to the Optimum Correspondence of the body to its environment.

In terms of psychology, the Pseudo-conservative assessment is the evaluative system of the Identities, or personifications created for the purpose of producing objectives, butcher baker, primarily as results and products external to the self. Both the Pseudo-conservative and Liberal psychologies are created as Identities, and are not it would be said, be inherent to the natural as born body and Ego.

(90 of 96) Next Page