Considerations

Correlations between
Excess and Profit and Monotheism would be said to exist. With the introduction of Excess and Profit, therein takes place a separation of humankind from nature and the introduction of antithetical opposition.
Nature is a unified Whole of which the economic law is Necessity and Subsistence. Excess and Profit contravenes nature and separates humans from the rest of the natural world. Fore a meal the hare becomes a rabbit skin industry.

Excess and Profit is created from the transformation of things destroyed. What is destroyed must be given a consequence, such that it justifies its destruction and which is in general an antithetical opposite to what is to be created. The property was stolen from the witch and wizard couple and became of profit to the church.

Consequence becomes bipolar as means and ends. What is of Consequence becomes arbitrary as that which is means to ends and end results itself. The negation of the validity and consequence of any state or entity, is the negations of means to create ends.

The introduction of Excess and Profit introduces the concept of material resource and thus Materialism, wherein meaning and Consequence of entities are defined by Finite Determination, or results and products produced external to the entity or self. The ice-maker, football field, corn husker or doctor, lawyer and postal delivery person as what each produces.

The evaluative system of Materialism is called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative as degrees of Consequence ascertained as some degree of one to ten between antithetical opposites.

The antithetical poles nature and city, bad and good, earth and heaven can be construed as means and ends or materials for and results and products produced. Scale one or no Consequence in and of itself and scale ten the supreme Consequence of perfection.

Not that there is any historical correlation in which the antithetical polarity of Consequence derived from the introduction of Excess and Profit correlates to the introduction of Monotheism. One God is a singular authority of agreement to unify the diverse divisions arising from the multiplicity of specialities, employments, occupations, vocations and engagements created by Excess and Profit. Secular rule of kings and autocrats may be consolidated as emulation under the singularity of All is One God.

Is the monotheistic God socialist or capitalist ? Does God produce products internal to itself as a Whole defined as Socialist ? Or the pooling of the collective resources of any group of individuals for the benefit of All equally ? Does God produce products external to itself as the definition of a Part defined as Capitalist ? Or the profits generated from Excess and Profit to benefit the One or few ?

Results and products produced external, is the definition of materialist-meaning called Finite Determination. Results and products as altered states explain the activity and behavior of change as increased value and Consequence. Thus God would be a materialist.

If the results and products of God are internal to itself it might be explained by the concept of Existent Determination which is change as promoting the preservation of the pre-existent states changed in same or similar states and condition. Since this is the state of nature and its preservation, God would be a Socialist.

However some Monotheists have God separate from nature which in some cases is antithetical to God. In fact the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is nature degree one, primitive, undeveloped. While God like properties degree ten the antithetical opposite of supreme perfection. This separation of God from nature would negate a Whole and suggest a Part.

But then again since Monotheism means one God and no others, then God cannot be a Part but must be a Whole or All results and products produced internal to itself defined as Existent Determination meaning results and products inherent in self-composition. An all inclusive God would be socialist.

Monotheism meaning one and only one God cannot be fascist since there are no other Gods. However if the one-God concept is not accepted by all persons then it is fascist to foist the concept on those that disagree.

And since it is an historical fact that people cannot agree on one God and murder even at this minute those whose God or Gods are different, it can be said that Monotheism is for the most part fascist and has a history of holocaust as exemplified by God himself with his eternal hell.

(88 of 96) Next Page