Considerations

Actually I am
a Nazi Viking by genetics, the traces of my genes. Does that explain who I am ? Hot blooded Italian. Cold Icelandic. German cleanliness. French romance.

What I have always thought was that nationality typecasting was like the kennel club registration of dogs. Definitely materialism. Genetic inheritance. Birthright typecast personality traits. I have never been a subscriber.

Another version of instinct. It's instinctive and explains all animal behavior, like the distinctiveness of Pavlov's dogs. Conditioned response. Hit me once, hit me twice, the third time I duck.

I have no brains only instinct. But your honor instinct made me do it. Well in court I must have a brain, otherwise the court makes no sense. How can one be tried for instinct like a cat for killing a mouse. O but that cat is too cute. It can think but pretends it can't, and gets away with it.

With my genes I should be serving a life sentence for marauding and murder. However I have never marauded. But then again I am something of an intellectual warrior. Nationality type-casters are I would say, not that intellectually unchallenged, and treat their dogs like they were sub-animal. Type-casters like to believe they know strangers without ever having gone to the trouble of talking to them. Everything is an assumption and in my case from my experience, most always wrong. O a few have hit it right on.

Like an American journalist now capitalist propagandist, everything they think they know about Putin would be wrong. They are incapable of compassion which is to say put themselves in the others place. To run a country ? They wouldn't last five minutes when every assumption is wrong and where Putin has said : “We all have something in common because we’re human beings.” What in common could a capitalist propagandist find with Putin ? I would assume not much if anything at all.

A specific level of intelligence. One sees what one looks for. One perceives only what one can understand. Perhaps level four one to ten, to use the progressive index scale of everything. Instinctivists are not very bright to my experience, the school of Freud. But I suppose of a certain level of intelligence and pseudo-psychology, it makes for a certain kind of intelligence.

I early on became a relative condionalist, finding no instinct which would cause me to do things against my will. However it is only intelligent to get with the program. Do in Rome as the Romans do, or continually be in opposition to those around one. Conditioning, if one hears a fire siren and one thingks fire.

Either way materialism is limited in scope to cause and affect and gravitational what goes up must come down unless it is a rocket. Yes I must have decided that rocket fuel would be a blast off from gravitational materialism.

Spirituality would involve another level of intelligence, though instinctivists might assume no more than hocus pocus nope us. If spiritual phenomenon could be observed, then it could be studied and if it could be influenced to produce observable material affects, then it would be of a another level of intelligence.

But the point is, rather than material genetic inheritance, and of course there is a great deal of influence genetically, conditionally and geographically, I would presume myself of spiritual inheritance.

And of the two dimensions, namely this and how should one conduct themselves in this considering a next ? Does one sit pat and hold one's hand, no discards and no draws considering the possible affects of a possible future life, or should one if one has the ability and power, affect this life in a seeming positive way, though it may result in can or can't karma, of unknown affects ?

Sit pat like saying, I'm not going to live until I have time for it when I retire. Is the present not spiritual but only the future ? Life is now and personal-future, may or may-not come to be.

Should not one conduct themselves as if now is all there is and will ever be, the renown of creation ? It already is or it already isn't, but we are progressively working towards it. If genetics is all there is then one's children are important as the only continuance of oneself. And thus children shall not have a life of their own but must live the continuance of the engenderer, live one's parents lives in perpetuity ?

But I want a life of my own. No you must live for the family who lived for you. Not for themselves but the future, the not now ? Is a better life or just different ? Is working in a factory better than working on a farm or is it easier with modern plumbing and city lights ?

No I am but a visitor a tourist of the material plane holding a ticket to immateriality. And when one knows that the planet's human inhabitants suffer from contextual illusion and one knows the truth, that they are all wrong, is it time to move on ?

(78 of 96) Next Page