Intelligence

The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative defines what is of Consequence, and to the extent that Consequence determines awareness, the dyadic would determine Intelligence. The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is integral with the class system called the Antipodal Associative Paradigm. The individual's Consequence is classed from one to ten or from low to high class. For instance currently $10,000 a year US is low class. $30,000 is lower-middle class. $50,000 is middle and $70,000 is upper-middle class. $100,000 or $1,000,000 is upper class. But then there is old money and the new no-class crass money.

Awareness as determined by class, the lower classes are more practical and hands-on while the upper classes are more educated and socially aware. Each is its own kind of intelligence as class awareness. The under-half gets things done with their hands. The over-half gets things done by connections, each equally as stupid about the culture of the other. Class as from one to ten, each digit a class consciousness. Or the system could begin with zero as the untouchable class, of which the pseudo-conservatives would embrace for exploitation purposes, wherein the zeros have no redeeming qualities. For liberals the system starts with one, wherein there is compassion for the lower classes, and wherein liberals are generally middle class.

One and two as lower, three and four as lower-middle, five and six as middle, seven and eight as upper-middle and nine and ten as upper, the five basic divisions of class. Only India and possibly Japan have an officially recognized untouchable class, although the zero would be found more individually everywhere that human exploitation would be found. Essentially each class level would be contained of different degrees of Consequence as the lowest to the highest. Each level of Consequence would be of different degrees of awareness.

Intelligence (4 of 19) Next Page