Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
It would be said that what is considered of Consequence determines the consciousness of the individual, as of what the individual perceives and is aware in everyday ordinary reality. Today people would rather stare at their phones than be conscious of what they are externally.
It is said then that Consequence would be a determining factor of one's awareness which in turn would indicate one's intelligence. How is Consequence determined ? Consequence of course is derived from experience but by the evaluative system of the
Progressive materialist Paradigm as modern culture. Consequence is
determined by the unconscious mechanism of what is called the
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. The Dyadic is an oppositional evaluative mechanism as degrees of assessed value between
Antithetical Opposites such as good and bad, which assumes a numerical
designation between one and ten.
The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is how Consequence is assessed and established in the progressive materialistic system.
Low on the scale as zero or one to three is all things natural, undeveloped, primitive,
Indigenous, poor, uneducated, unrefined and the lower classes.
High on the scale as seven to ten is all things as human anomaly, such as the rich, educated, refined, developed, morally superior upper classes. Four thru six is the middle classes. To assess Consequence one adds from the bottom and subtracts from the top. A used car is assessed as something less than new and something more than a junker. Something less than a beauty queen or something more than a witch.
The individual then incorporated with this system, will pay little attention to what classed lowly and pay every attention to what's on high. Thus awareness parallels the dyadic. Intelligence then could be said to be based on the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative numerically.
Intelligence (3 of 19)
Next Page
