Determination

The Identities are equated with the One because Identities can be self serving objectives ..

Determination of the individual will be based upon the Identities one chooses.

Controversal:

The body is both a Whole and a Part called a Controversal. Every or any given element is a Whole in and of itself having Parts contained within, and any given Whole is a Part in and of itself, as a single element contained within a larger Whole. The body is a Whole in and of itself, and at the same a Part of a larger surrounding environment as a greater Whole. The body as a Whole in and of itself and as such Conservative, means the Ego must conform the internal body as a Constant, to proper maintenance such that it maintains its integrity of composition. A primary aspect of the body as a Part, is the concept of the Identities, the purpose of which is to produce artifacts external to the self. [sp]

External Authority:

The determination of Consequence, wherein the Selector of Association is Identities, means interpretation and evaluation from contexts, as producing results and products as envisaged by the mind, usually external to immediate present necessity, as agendas which may be independent of the Ego. Identities are called External Authority, because they are usually based on information and knowledge obtained vicarious to the actual experience of the body and Ego, through word of mouth, books, education, media, or any manner not of actual self-experience. External Authorities are the acceptance of dictates for thinking, activity and behavior from sources other than oneself and one's self-experience. Identities may be based on personifications as completely unnecessary and unrelated to the Ego, like radio announcer, long distance runner, locksmith or dentist. The Identities are likened to the function of the Part, the purpose of which is to produce results and products external to the producer. [sp]

Progressive Identities can be called Individualist as conforming to the dynamics of the Part. The Part is called Progressive when it produces products external to itself, which alters the state in which the Part exists, so as to better correspond the Whole to itself. Principles of Individualism would represent the Part as independent of the Whole, and especially where the Part represent an elite function to which the Whole should serve and opposed to the Part serving the Whole. [sp]

Dyadic Authoritative Comparative:

If products produced explains the time, energy and effort to produce them as superior to pre-existent conditions, a bipolar evaluative conflict ensues between pre-existent and changed states, and wherein change as distinct explains activity and behavior. Since products produced require resource from already existent conditions a further conflict is the result requiring a bipolar Evaluative System called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. [sp]

The system is based on negative and positive Comparative Base, as Antithetical Opposites. Consequence is assessed from the negative, generally defined as anything natural, as Additory Base to which Consequence is assessed as more than by comparison. Consequence is assessed from the positive, generally defined as ideal development, as Subtractive Base to which Consequence is assessed by comparison as less than. [sp]

Ipseities:

The term Ipseity represents selectors of Association, as conceptually created Identities, created in the mind by the Ego for the purpose of the Interpretation and Evaluation of assessed non-physical and other-dimensional Contexts. These are called Spiritual, Religious and Meta Ipseities. [sp]

Spiritual Ipseities:

Spiritual Ipseities are based on Internal Authority of the Whole. When the Whole is the function and purpose of the Part, the Part serves the Whole and the Whole is God. God as a Whole, is everything within itself, as all of its Parts. Every Part is God and every God is Part. This would represent the logic of the Polytheism in reference to the concepts of the Whole and the Part. [sp]

Spiritual Ipseities are defined as interpretive and evaluative contexts and personifications of sensory impressions directly experienced by the individual from the environment, as manifestations considered to be of other-dimensional phenomenon, as Internal Authority or personal experience, as instanced by the Intercession of other-dimensional manifestations. If the natural world is considered a Choate Whole, wherein its primary function is to produce products internal to itself, spiritual entities and manifestations may be considered as internal to the condition and subject to the appreciation of human sensory experience. [sp]

Religious Ipseities:

Religious Ipseities are based on External Authority of the Part. When the Part is the function and purpose of the Whole, the Whole serves the Part and the Part is God. God as a Part is everything within itself, and what God produces external to itself as the function of the Part. God is a single Part in an ungodly Whole as Monotheistic entity which produces and affects Godliness external to itself. Monotheism is the superior Part of an inferior Whole. [sp]

Religious Ipseities are defined as icons, image and word, as mandates for thought and behavior based on the External Authority, where the sources of conception is external to the individual, as organized religious instruction and education by others. These conceptions are generally based on theological systems where the natural world is rejected as a Choate Whole, and a conceptual replacement is necessary. God represents a superior Part of an inferior Whole, to which the individual is to conform and in the manner ot the Part produce Godly works. [sp]

Meta Ipseities:

Meta Ipseities are Identities created by the Ego for the purpose of the Interpretation and Evaluation of what is interpreted as non-physical and other-dimensional Contexts, but wherein Interpretive Context is outside the duality of Antithetical Opposition and is interpreted as Complimentary Opposition, as an intellectual Determination. [sp]

Meta Ipsieties may be developed into contexts for Interpretation which are outside both the Positive and Negative Dimensions, as matter and mind or out-of-body Cognizance. This is similar to the concept of the Watcher, as self-conscious remembering observation, which becomes unconscious and automatic over time, and not the out-of-body experience of what is called astral projection. [sp]

Metpaphysical Determination:

Metaphysical Ipseity:

The Metaphysical Ipseity is a Meta Ipseity as possessed of Enigmatic Belief, in which the Context for Interpretation is at the same time One and All, or the individual at the same time believes in the ability to be One as Somatic Being, wherein the individual must believe in the reality of the Sentient Self as limited, singular experience; and at the same time All, as the Psychesoma or the belief in the reality of the Second Self as unlimited, multible, all and everything.

Memory as events, circumstance or situation as encapsulated into elements, as can be compared with any other element of memory, in any given instance as mix and match. Elements of memory are removed from the contexts of events, circumstance or situation and thus one can compare any one or more to any other one or more elements of memory. Thus by removing context, any One element of memory can be compared to All elements of memory or as One and All.

Change as evaluated from the internality of the Whole is said to be called Constant, which is change as the continuous preservation and duplication of Condition in near exact likeness, and thus the Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Constant. Change as evaluated from the externality of the Part as some function in support of the Whole like the body's stomach, is Constant when conforming to the Whole. However ............ is called Random when it is some degree of derivation from Constant and thus the Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Random or the exception. The standard of comparison is what is unusual and exceptional.

Politics (2 of x) Next Page