Lexloci
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
This evaluative system is called the
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, as a scale of zero to ten for the
Pseudo-Conservatives and one to ten for
Liberals. Nature, the undeveloped, uneducated, crude and crass, indigenous, lower classes on the bottom, and elite, refined, developed, educated, sophisticated aristocratic at the top of the class system, or the progressive materialistic evaluative system. The system is unconscious.
Pseudo Conservatives are generally called right-wing and are not Conservative at all but Progressive, as the accumulation of ever more assets and wealth. They would tend to believe in zero worth as no redeeming qualities
because, well certainly hell is for those of no redemptive
character, and because there is no sympathy for the devil,
and because they need enemies to justify their greed.
Liberals call themselves Progressives but in actuality are Conservative. Good luck huamity. And though they think Conservatively as ecologists, local farming or socialized medicine, they may live progressively as material asset acquisition. They believe in redemption, walk in another's shoes and reform, so bottom is the numeral one as some flicker of good. Both Pseudo-conservatives and Liberals are of the Progressive Paradigm.
The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is the foundation of
Morality. Unlike
Ethics based on prohibition, what Morality allows is determined by the value and Consequence of the subject, such that how an entity is treated is dependent upon Consequence as assigned on the dyadic scale. Thus dastardly acts may be committed against persons of lowly scale-reading, which would not-be allowed against higher status entities. The Progressive Materialist evaluative system is a double standard, one for the low and another the high.
And certainly
Compassion is a joke. How much Compassion is there for people on the lower end of the scale ? Or for those on the upper end depending on the scale location of the compassioner.
Progressive Paradigm (5 of 10)
Next Page
