PreludeNew

Economics :

The two primary types of economics are defined as Socialism and Capitalism, and wherein a third might be added called Amalgamism. Socialism is non-profit Government, wherein specific aspects of the economy are socialized, meaning produced and regulated by the Government for all individuals, of the governed province equitably. Government jobs are for the most part perpetuation and maintenance, as such things as roads, bridges, water, power or fire and police protection, schools, libraries, parks, health and hospitals, regulations or welfare, and are funded by the collective resources of the community at large in the form of taxes.

Capitalism is defined as primarily private enterprise, wherein the Excess and Profit of economic activity and behavior benefits primarily individuals, family and the few as the owners, and wherein the workers are paid generally a minimum allowable wage. Amalgamism would deem all Necessities and Subsistence common to All, the province of Government, and superfluities, nonessentials, tastes, non-essentials or discretionary the province of Capitalism. Socialism would describe the economic mode of the Whole, whereas Capitalism would be more akin to the Part. Amalgamism would consider the Product.

Socialism

Socialism is the pooling of the collective resources of any group of individuals, for the purpose of producing benefit for the whole in the form of Government, and of which the pooled resources are utilized as best benefits all. Insurance, banks, churches and nature are all instances of socialism, when not used for private profit. Needs common to all such as food, housing, heat, light, roads, disposals, healthcare, education and communications, transportation or police and fire are and would be the province of Socialism. Non-essentials as preference, supplementary, superfluity or exclusiveness and would be the province of Capitalism. The commonality of All would be the function of Government, and the individuality of One would be the province of Capitalism. A combination of the two would be descriptive of Amalgmism.

Analogous of Socialism is the Whole, which is called Government that acts as a unifying authority for all the diverse individuals and interests in the society, and to serve the community and larger society in common as the whole equitably. The primary function of a Whole is said to produce Products as infrastructure and services internal to itself, in support of all the Parts and to create a harmonious friction free community.

Most socialist entities are of free access for everyone, such as public roads, lighting, libraries, city hall, public buildings and the like. Renters it could be said are Socialists in that they do not own the property they live on and in. But residence is private with no public access, and it must be this way, unless living in an army barracks.

A Whole is described as a circumscribed domain or the territory of a political union as an incorporated town, city, metropolis or nation. A Whole is composed of elements or Parts, of which in conjunction comprise a Unified Function. Parts can be compared to citizens of which a certain number work for the collective, providing the services of the community as government workers and who are all socialists. These would be administrators, politicians, street or water-works workers, park and library employees. Of the Parts or people that don't work for the government, we could call Capitalists.

Capitalism

Where Socialism is defined as economic output purposed to benefit the Whole and All, the economic benefit of Capitalism is said purposed to benefit the Part, One and the few. Capitalism descends from Excess and Profit as Progressive, which is antithetical to nature as Necessity and Subsistence, of which is Conservative. Small Capitalism is for the most part honest and good, and everyone loves a good restaurant or ice cream parlor. However, Corporate Capitalism, while efficient and reliable, has a tendency to concentrate wealth and is subject to greed and every crime known to known.

Capitalism, as meant here, is the production and selling of entities and commodities for profit, or the selling of excess for private profit. Private individuals for private purposes produce salable goods such as vegetables, clothes, housing, entertainment or anything that people will purchase, and the more the better, as more profit and more excess. Thus, Capitalism is Progressive, and the authority is Post-changed States, or changed states as opposed to original qualities and conditions.

Analogous of Capitalism is the Part which is called private purpose. The primary function of a Part is said to produce Products external to itself, as excess for traffic and trade external for profit. The Part may produce Products in the interest of the Whole called All, or it may produce Products in the interest of the self called One. Capitalism by definition produces Products external to itself for self-interest as One.

Amalgamism

Amalgamism would be a combination of Socialism and Capitalism, the primary distinction being that socialist Government would provide all needs and necessities common to all regardless, and Capitalism would provide wants, desires, wishes or individual exclusivity, as best corresponds and does not conflict with Government or the interest of the All.

Actually Amalgamism is the way it is now in most places, as Government and Capitalism, except the capitalists usually aren't smart enough to recognize, and because they need it; it can't be recognized as the hated socialism. The problem is that some capitalists will steal the Government whenever and wherever they can, whereby Government for the many as All becomes Government for the few and One. Capitalists will not regulate themselves, except as to ever further the concentration of wealth, and therefore it becomes the province of Government to regulate Capitalism in the interests of the Whole and the All.

Amalgamism would represent the Product of Socialism and Capitalism as a balance of systems, where both would thrive equally well, for the benefit of the All as opposed to only the One. The Part should fare well in the Context of the Whole of which it is a Part, as well as the Whole of which all the Parts are healthy.

New Prelude (16 of 17) Next Page