Meaning

But first of all there must be awareness as some sort of sensory cognizance, as a sense of I or me-ness and self. Can awareness exist without a sensory apparatus no matter the dimensionality ? I am - but without memory, one would not-know what-one was aware. Does it matter ? if independent of it. So what ? Thus it must be assumed that necessary to is-ness would be awareness and memory. If the environment was no threat to the being-ness, there would not be necessary pleasure/pain mechanisms. But certainly there would need to be boundaries as push-back or un-walkable thru walls, grounding, or distinction between is-ness and other-ness. Perhaps a realm for being, wherein is-ness is aware of other-ness and the memory of it.

Thought is memory and what is one without thought, although some gurus don't much care for it, or so they say. Things just happen but apparently nothing that requires thought. Memory mechanism is the relation between being-ness and externalities, or thinking thoughts and thought creations, both of external and internal expression. The body of non-physical being would be called here Soul or Psychesoma, which would mean an agency of awareness. And one would guess memory would be an aspect and the ability to think. Awareness without body must be awareness of all, with no personal singular, particular, limiting self interest. What is the Context of Interpretation ? I am what happens but can I direct myself ? To what interest ? No a mere mechanism of happening, here, there, everywhere. Would that be the definition of God as simple is-ness, but with awareness like total paralysis of intensive care.

So let's give Soul a body as limitation of awareness. This then would make an embodied Soul a Part of this larger all-happening. Well every Whole is a Part and every Part is a Whole except a Choate Whole.

Meaning (14 of 20) Next Page