Emotion

The top of the scale would garner the greatest emotional consideration and empathy. At the bottom as the poor, uneducated, unconnected, crass and deplorables as the least Consequence would engender the least emotional sympathy and rapport.

The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is an evaluative system based on antithetical opposites, which could be called Bipolar Consequence, and of which a bipolar emotional complex is derived. No or little Consequence should generate only apathy, indifference and detachment. However it is often the case that the greatest emotional fury, acrimony, ferocity and frenzy is generated toward deemed antithetical opposites. The greater the affect of Consequence, the greater the emotional response.

The answer would be Disconjunctive Association as the complete misrepresentation of reality to suit primarily objectives, and which otherwise could be called lying, propaganda, political, religious, or generic, to the detriment of All and the benefit of One. The what is antithetical to ambitions are loaded down with demeaning, disparaging, degrading adjectives attached to Consequence to engender the greatest repugnant emotional reaction. He's a snake in the grass. Whether it be Christians, Jews, or Muslims, non-monotheists are said to be demons destined to hell. The Germans, Japanese or Arabs eat babies in war-time. To save ourselves, the enemy must be destroyed although we've never seen the enemy, in these parts or in this country for that matter. To give a name to this misappropriation of verbiage is to call it hate.

In terms of the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, love would be representative of the Metaphysical Ideal and hate the Antithetical Matrix. Love what is above and hate what is below. In fact in so far as the Progressive Paradigm and Excess & Profit is concerned hatred is mandated with the creation of Progressive Materialism, wherein Consequential Negation would deem the All inherently worthless and of no Consequence.

Emotion (13 of 14) Next Page