1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Progressive Propensities :
Is a Metabody like an atom that can neither be created or destroyed?
Is a Metabody like a Whole, wherein the material body is a Part?
Probably the most common theory is the Perfect Part
Progressive. The Monotheists have it that an earthly-ware-one, must apologize for one's lowly existence, and then work objective Identity wise, to become more perfect, as is the most perfect God. The difference between the Monotheists and the Progressive Reincarnationists, is a one shot lifetime only and failing is eternal hell, or the any number of tries Progressive Reincarnation, which is a hell of a lot more compassionate.
But on the other hand the Monotheists and Metaphysical Idealists of every stripe, millions of which must the most evil people ever to exit in the universe, and why would we ever want them reincarnated? I mean once was enough, and on that score, one time heaven and hell in the instance of these particular persons, sounds better than reincarnation. And they forgive themselves, God the forgiver, always and absentee landlord, see a priest and confess, and murder and mayhem can go to heaven. Makes a mockery of it, doesn't one think? But then, they are so stupid they honestly believe they are goodliest creatures ever evolved. How can you prosecute a Crockofvile?
The perfect Part as the progression of Buddhism, is the awakening or enlightenment, as a state of beatific consciousness, and if I can name it, I can't know, and if I know I can't say, the con artist's dream, of which if people acquire the consciousness, but then lose it, and they do - BuddhaPoof - they may then regret the loss for the rest of their half lives. It would seem most spirituality, religion, theories of other-dimensionality, are Progressive. The next world and life has to be better than this, the Metaphysical Ideal. Is there any other-dimensionality of no better than this? Would that be
Conservative?
Metaphysics (11 of x) Next Page